A Viral Awakening
As
I’m writing this, the world is reeling from the attack of yet another mysterious
and deadly virus-the erstwhile 2019-nCov, now COVID-19. As the world watches the
unfolding story from China, scientists are already at work, trying to develop
potential vaccines and antidotes for this virus. Remarkably, a rapid screening
test was promptly employed only within weeks of the outbreak and several
vaccine candidates are being lined up to be tested in the coming months. A stellar
testament to the power of modern science, such a moment calls for reflection to
understand and perhaps reset societal priorities.
In
a world which increasingly undermines intellectuals, knowledge and facts, it is
important to reflect how moments of crises like this shine a bright light on the
same people and institutions.
Most
people around the world can afford to sleep peacefully and maintain normalcy in
life because they implicitly trust the expertise of scientists, doctors and
other institutions working around the clock to prevent this from ballooning
into a worldwide pandemic. Yet this should not be taken for granted. Just less
than a century ago, before the advent of antibiotics and most vaccines, the
risk of death by microbial infections was widespread—an inescapable reality of human
life. Vaccination is arguably the most important and effective life-saving
intervention known to humankind; which makes the “Anti-Vax” agenda simply incredulous
and mindbogglingly stupid! Perhaps in moments like these, people who support or
even sympathize with this movement may get a glimpse of what modern society
would look like without vaccines—constantly threatened by deadly microbes and
frequently on the throes of serial global pandemics capable of causing serious
damage to human life and well-being.
Our
reaction as a species to this outbreak and the measures thereafter perhaps speak
of another rather interesting duality of the human mind. While we are perfectly
agreeable to the sanctions and economic costs from the precautionary measures
at the onset of this outbreak, even a minimal disruption of the status quo for future
crises that are imminent and inevitable, seems unthinkable (Yes, I’m talking
about issues such as climate change). Like climate models, epidemiological
models of the spread of infectious disease too, suffer from large variabilities
and uncertainties. Yet, no arguments were made to undermine the validity of the
potential danger, citing the inability to exactly predict the outcome. It boils
down to immediacy and ubiquity. A viral pandemic is swift and indiscriminate.
The opposite is true for issues like climate change. It is a slow and silent
danger that is likely to affect some parts of the world way more than others. We don’t have to all agree on the way forward
with global problems like environmental pollution and climate change. These are
inherently political questions that require robust debate over complex issues. But
we can’t afford to come to the table in denial of the truth. Perhaps moments
like these can help people realize the value of hard facts and expertise and rally
them together to solve complex global problems.
Comments
Post a Comment